Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2022 8:10am
Rees-Moog seems to think it’s closer to 50 years before any “benefits” can be seen - and he’s the Brexit Minister. But what does he know. 50 years is long enough for people to forget anyone promised them any benefits, so well played Rees-Mogg.
But in 50 years time Brexit will just be a bad memory. The Anti EU crowd complained and gnashed their teeth for close on 40 years until they got sufficient support to get their way. Rejoin will be exactly the same - it’ll be the long game and saying “get over it” will have no power. You can expect these arguments to continue for at least another 30 - 40 years, and the youth who are the leaders and voters of tomorrow are predominantly pro EU. It may take another 30 years, but UK will be back - they can’t afford not to be. As I have said numerous times before, there is no more Empire, UK has chosen to be one small country outside the economic power of a United block. And isn’t that UKs argument? “Stronger Together”? or does that only apply when Scotland seeks independence from Westminster rule … bit hypocritical.
But the arguments about “running our own country”, “getting our country back”, “regaining our sovereignty” or “control of our borders” are just so much horsefeathers - Britain always was a sovereign country with control of its borders (despite having “control of its borders”, net migration from countries outside the EU has increased since Brexit), and any EU legislation it didn’t like, it could have veto’d - it had that power …
but the thing Brexit supporters don’t like to acknowledge is that half the legislation people whinge about having “forced” on them, Britain helped actually draft! The remainder it didn’t veto or vote against. With Farage as an MEP, he was too busy grandstanding by turning his back on the EU parliament - you have him to thank for the fishing industry in UK going into decline, by the way. He dropped the ball on that quite significantly.